Looking for a good indicator

There are many Covid 19 data points. I have been trying to find a reliable data point that could easily indicate whether a country has passed a critical milestone (and from then on things are less daunting.)

The total confirmed is not a good one. It can be skewed by insufficient tests devices, lack of medical staff, total population, delay of the tests, only testing the severe cases, etc. and we don’t know by how much.

I am thinking the recovered-death ratio may be a good one. For those countries and regions now considered relatively in a better shape:

  • China: 75770/3304 = 23
  • South Korea: 5228/158 = 33
  • Singapore: 212/3 = 71
  • Hongkong: 118/4 = 30

Data as of 3/29. https://google.org/crisisresponse/covid19-map

United States now is: 4767/2510 = 2.

The threshold seems to be around 20.

This ratio is also skewed by the delay, but to get to the territory of around 20, a country should have gone to a point that not just testing severe cases but a larger coverage and also level of delay should be quite negligible.

update (6/29/2020): after posted this, I realized the recovered counter is a joke in the US reported figures from statistical usefulness perspective. Patients get discharged back home without reliable tracking mechanism even tested positive.

Wondering if US is heading the right path by not collecting key data. Technology has been a double-edge sword. So far, for many thousands years, it hasn’t stopped or slowed down for reasons like it might create disaster if it is used inappropriately.

[Notes] Unique Leadership Concepts You Need to Know (from training notes by Maddy)

When an individual tends to jump into parent mode (critical or over nurturing) they create an opportunity for an individual to act like a child (dependent, whiney or rebellious) or vice versa. But adult (rational) behavior creates adult behavior.
For Example: A manager might say “I asked you to be done with that by Wednesday and now it’s Thursday. I’m really frustrated now” (parent) and a direct report might respond with “I’m sorry but it wasn’t my fault” (child).

Great insight. I have been leading/managing teams by following my gut feeling. But verifying the “correctness” of my approaches by the results is not a reliable approach. Theories like the above provide reasoning of why I should be saying/doing some things while not saying/doing some other things.

海猿(或者水猿,Aquatic Ape)——我所接受的进化论

今天看了Elaine Morgan的演讲,我被震撼了,我现在更偏向于相信水猿理论。

现在的人类是从满身是毛的类人猿,经过几百万年进化而来的,从森林到无树大草原,因为要适应热带气候,逐渐脱毛。由于制造工具和便于携带武器,于是解放双手,直立行走。

以上的理论,就犹如地球是圆的一般,已经成为不容置疑的事实,印在教科书里。我也一直觉得没有问题。

但是在科学界,已经提出了很多类人猿进化论不能解释的疑点:

  • 根据考古学发现,人类直立行走远远早于懂得制造工具,就是说,人类是出于某种原因,不得不直立行走的。
  • 在大草原用脱毛来解决过热的观点很可疑,绝大部分热带草原动物都是有毛的,因为毛可以防止太阳直射皮肤,想想皮肤癌。

人类似乎不是从森林来到草原的,更像是从海里直接来到草原的:

  • 没有毛的哺乳类动物基本只有两种:地下生长的和水生的。鼹形鼠常年躲在地下。鲸、海豚、海象、海牛都是在海里的。例外的是貘,猪,象和河马等,它们都是活着泥潭或者沼泽中的。
  • 关于直立行走。其实,直立行走对于在草原生存是不利的,当追捕或者被追捕的时候,两脚是远不如四腿跑得快的,想想猎豹狮子等。而且直立容易曝露身体要害,遭攻击时更致命。除了人类之外,有另外一种海生动物企鹅,也是直立行走的。如果人类祖先需要从海里迁移到陆地,或者迁移到陆地后生活区域长期受洪水威胁,直立的确更有生存优势,符合优胜劣汰的原则。现存的两种最接近直立行走的动物长臂猴和倭黑猩猩都是生活在长期受洪水冲击的地方的,而且它们都是喜水的。
  • 脂肪。
    • 人类脂肪比例是同等体型动物平均的10倍。
    • 两类动物喜欢积存脂肪:冬眠的和水生的。冬眠的脂肪是季节性的,而人类脂肪没有明显季节性。
    • 毛是陆生动物身体的保暖层,脂肪则是水生动物最好的保暖层。
    • 陆生动物的大部分脂肪是积存在内脏的,水生动物是附在表皮下的,人类脂肪大部分分布在皮肤下。
  • 呼吸
    • 人的呼吸是自愿呼吸,也就是可以自由控制,绝大部分哺乳类都不可以。但是控制呼吸对于生活在水里的哺乳类是必备的。而且能够使用语言沟通,自愿呼吸也是不能缺少的。
    • 喉头下置。这种设计令气管和食道靠在一起,食物容易进入气管,除非用口来呼吸非常重要,否则这是一种很差的设计。在水里,能用口呼吸,是很重要的。除了人类,大部分哺乳类都没有喉头下置。例如狗要吠,它是要先把喉头往下顶,才可以发声。
  • 汗腺。人类汗腺设计极其容易流失水分和盐分,这两种东西在热带草原是很珍贵的,在海里却是到处都有。
  • 感动流泪。很多海生动物都是通过刺激某种感动导致流泪从而达致排除体内多余盐分的目的的。没有其他陆生动物是这样的。
  • 人类大脑每天需要定量Omega-3脂肪酸,这在海洋食物链里到处都是,在陆地食物链却没有多少。

想了解更多细节解释,看这里。以上大部分是我从里面意译的,有些论据我觉得不太有说服力,就跳过了。

我现在似乎更加明白了为什么人不开心就跑到海边大喊,也更能理解为什么无敌海景的住房这么吸引!